<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Social Media) Experts vs. Masters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinnovationist.com/2010/01/social-media-experts-vs-masters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinnovationist.com/2010/01/social-media-experts-vs-masters/</link>
	<description>Irregular Ideas on Business, Philosophy, and Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:52:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Chant</title>
		<link>http://theinnovationist.com/2010/01/social-media-experts-vs-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Chant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnovationist.com/?p=603#comment-143</guid>
		<description>I know this is an old post, but I wanted to chip in. In the areas in which I work, I prefer to call myself a &#039;practitioner&#039;. I feel that it&#039;s more accurate and less (not at all) boastful. The problem with both &#039;expert&#039; and &#039;master&#039; is that it implies you already know it all; &#039;practitioner&#039; implies that you&#039;re working and learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an old post, but I wanted to chip in. In the areas in which I work, I prefer to call myself a &#39;practitioner&#39;. I feel that it&#39;s more accurate and less (not at all) boastful. The problem with both &#39;expert&#39; and &#39;master&#39; is that it implies you already know it all; &#39;practitioner&#39; implies that you&#39;re working and learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
